How's This For The Stupidest Lawsuit In History? Batman Vs. Batman.
By George 'El Guapo' Roush on November 12, 2008
Pretty sure I can leave the jokes up to you guys in the comments section. Please refrain from overusing "WTF" as your subject header. I recommend just spelling the entire thing out. Thank you!

From the land of lawsuits:

Batman has a new adversary: Batman.

The mayor of an oil-producing city in southeastern Turkey, which has the same name as the Caped Crusader, is suing helmer Christopher Nolan and Warner Bros. for royalties from mega-grosser "The Dark Knight."


Huseyin Kalkan, the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party mayor of Batman, has accused "The Dark Knight" producers of using the city's name without permission.


"There is only one Batman in the world," Kalkan said. "The American producers used the name of our city without informing us."


No one from the town of Batman has explained why it took so many years to take legal action. Batman first appeared as a comicbook character in 1939 and the "Batman" TV series started in 1966. Tim Burton's first bigscreen rendition for Warner Bros. came out in 1989. Undoubtedly the fact that "Dark Knight" is about to pass the $1 billion mark at the B.O. played a part in stirring the ire of the Turkish hamlet.


The mayor is prepping a series of charges against Nolan and Warner Bros., which owns the right to the Batman character, including placing the blame for a number of unsolved murders and a high female suicide rate on the psychological impact that the film's success has had on the city's inhabitants.


Former natives of Batman are also said to have encountered obstacles when attempting to register their businesses abroad.


The mayor is working on gathering evidence he claims will show that the city of Batman predates the 1939 debut of Bob Kane's superhero in DC Comics.


"We are only aware of this claim via press reports and have not seen any actual legal action," a Warner Bros. rep said in a statement.


While the town of Batman has suddenly shown great interest in the property, there's no evidence that the citizenry has ever shown much loyalty to the Caped Crusader -- not even on Halloween.


That mayor just pissed off an entire planet of comic book geeks. I hope they have more than just Norton Anti-Virus installed on their intranet.


Source: The Trades
Comments
WTF
Commented By: James on 2008-11-12 04:01:37
I'm not trying to be racist or rude, but it is the fact that TDK is about to make $1 billion in the BO and even more $$$ from the Blu-ray/DVD sales. I don't know how this town looks like but, i can safely say it is a poor town with low income earners. This is just a get-rich-quick-scheme. All the text above points to this, but there are two sides to a story. If the $1 billion (US Dollars none the less, I'm from Australia) is the only reason. Wow what a new low.
Sorry about the 'WTF'
Commented By: James on 2008-11-12 04:07:59
I just had a quick read before, i read it more now. It's an oil producing town shouldn't they have money? Anyone an expert or know something about this town? If they have money, wow another low, this time for their 'greediness'. I'm sure not everyone in the town likes this.
RANDOMGuy
Commented By: Dude on 2008-11-12 05:31:57
SO what! The city of Melbourne ( AUSTRALIA) has a street named "batman".
See? I'm not greedy...
Commented By: Xmenth Elaststand on 2008-11-12 05:57:26
I almost sued Brett Ratner for using my name too.

Commented By: Poco on 2008-11-12 09:23:21
This sounds very gay!

on 2008-11-12 09:29:15
I`m going to sue Perter Jackson for King Kong, no one ask my permision to do a replica of my Dick!!

on 2008-11-12 09:29:17
I`m going to sue Perter Jackson for King Kong, no one ask my permission to do a replica of my Dick!!
Fuck that
on 2008-11-12 09:29:22
I`m going to sue Perter Jackson for King Kong, no one ask my permission to do a replica of my Dick!!
Fuck that
on 2008-11-12 09:29:33
I`m going to sue Perter Jackson for King Kong, no one ask my permission to do a replica of my Dick!!
Fuck that
Commented By: Kong....King Kong on 2008-11-12 09:30:45
I`m going to sue Perter Jackson for King Kong, no one ask my permission to do a replica of my Dick!!
Ya know what?
Commented By: Kell on 2008-11-12 11:24:53
Fuck these guys! "The mayor is prepping a series of charges against Nolan and Warner Bros., which owns the right to the Batman character, including placing the blame for a number of unsolved murders and a high female suicide rate on the psychological impact that the film's success has had on the city's inhabitants." They're even blaming the movie for suicides and murders! This is ridiculous! Again, fuck 'dem!
HA-HA-HA!!!!
Commented By: SCARECROW420 on 2008-11-12 13:26:02
This will no doubt seriously delay the next chapter in Nolans series of Batflicks.. What to do! What to do???? WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Gasp!(out of breath)
Commented By: SCARECROW420 on 2008-11-12 13:28:58
there......o.k. WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! BAT..WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.........OHHHH MMMMY GGGOOOODDDD! NO MORE MOVIE'S WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Whatever?
Commented By: El Diablo on 2008-11-12 13:30:00
'Batman' is Trademarked. even so, the statute of limitations must have run out years ago. Batman can eat a Dick!
STOCKS PLUMMETING!
Commented By: 2FACE420 on 2008-11-12 13:36:12
WAYNE ENTERPRISES STOCK HAS JUST REACHED $0.00 WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
This is the dumbest thing ive ever fucking Read
Commented By: Al on 2008-11-12 16:56:14
If this is serous, then this guy of this town, just made himself out to be a GLOBAL ASSHOLE!
...
Commented By: brian on 2008-11-12 18:37:14
good luck w/ that one asshole.
Dark Knight
Commented By: Mole on 2008-11-12 19:19:46
At one point of batman history batman was called Dark Knight but was too scary for children so they changed it to batman again.
There''s no way
Commented By: Chad on 2008-11-14 05:29:32
There's no way they could win this. If DC Comics copyrighted and trademarked "Batman" or "The Dark Knight" that means no one can use that name for a business, not a town. A Town can call itself whatever the fuck it wants, it's not a sole business. Now if the oil company was called "Batman" then it'd be a different story and these Turks would be legally screwed in the courtroom. They are mad because a madeup character has the same name as their old ass town? Why would that matter? Isn't there a movie coming out called Austrailia which will be trademarked in the movie/entertainment department. The country isn't going to sue Hugh Jackman cause he was involved in a movie with the same name. This Batman town cannot win this in court since they do not own any businesses with the same assumed business name.