Studio Looking To Remake Cliffhanger. Only One Word For That...FAIL.

By George 'El Guapo' Roush on May 14, 2009
I'm curious as to what goes through the head of a studio exec. Who in their right fucking mind wants to do a remake of Stallone's Cliffhanger? And what audience member wants to even see it?

It's not like Cliffhanger was some instant classic. It was a fun cheesy Stallone pic where he ran around the mountains in a t-shirt and killed the bad guys. Why the fuck would anyone spend their time and money trying to remake that with a younger cast? Seriously, who gives a shit?

The trades has more:

Storming into Cannes with an ever-more muscular international slate and standout financial results, Gallic mini-major StudioCanal has announced that it will be teaming with Neal Moritz's L.A.-based Original Films to reboot "Cliffhanger."

A big-budget international action-adventure thriller set in a big mountain milieu, the makeover of Renny Harlin's 1993 pic will center on a group of young climbers.


"Just as they rebooted 'Star Trek,' we're going to do the same with 'Cliffhanger,' " said Moritz, who will produce. Unlike the original, where Italy stood in for the Colorado Rockies, the new redo looks set to feature multiple cliff-face locations.


Moritz ("Fast & Furious") and StudioCanal are looking to attach a screenwriter.


Aiming for a 2010 shoot, the makeover forms one of "a half-dozen or so projects" linking StudioCanal and Moritz, said StudioCanal chairman Olivier Courson.


Moritz is already producing an $80 million-plus  remake of "Escape from New York" for Warner Bros.-New Line and StudioCanal. And Universal and StudioCanal are co-financing the Moritz-produced narrative remake of docu "The Complete History of My Sexual Failures," with Jay Roach attached to direct.


Owned by Vivendi paybox Canal Plus, StudioCanal will fully finance "Cliffhanger."


"The Cliffhanger" announcement comes as StudioCanal looks to drive with ever more force into U.S., international and local movie production. It's also upping the number of international pictures it's producing per year to around five.


Despite the global economic downturn, StudioCanal has just released eye-catching financials with total 2008 sales of E400 million ($532.8 million), up 7.5%, and $74.6 million operating profits, up 22%.


But the Gallic studio wants more. Its production investment in 2008 was at $200 million. According to Courson, StudioCanal will now approach investors to raise complementary financing -- targeting specific slates -- pushing yearly production investment beyond $270 million a year.


StudioCanal has international production relationships with a slew of high-profile companies: Original, Montecito (on "Chloe"), Spyglass (the Charlize Theron-starrer "The Tourist"), John Woo and Terence Chang's Lion Rock Prods. (for Kim Jee-woon's "Max and the Junkmen") and Media Asia -- where it co-finances Johnnie To's $40 million "The Red Circle," from a script by "Eastern Promises" director Steve Knight.


"Circle" begins to shoot in early fall, Courson said.


Taking world rights outside the U.S., StudioCanal also co-financed thriller "Soon the Darkness," Argentine Marcos Efron's debut feature, with Amber Heard ("The Rum Diary"), and  Karl Urban ("Star Trek").


On Thursday, StudioCanal will showcase first footage from Ben Stassen's "Around the World in 50 Years," Europe's biggest digital 3-D movie to date, which StudioCanal will distribute directly in the U.K. (via Optimum Releasing), Germany (via Kinowelt) and France; StudioCanal will also handle international sales.


"The idea is to be the leading European studio, a credible alternative to Hollywood's majors, at the level of, say, Summit or Mandate, in production and international sales," Courson said.


Currently pushing hard into U.K. production, StudioCanal has the base, and the will.


Neil, seriously, I know you're a big producer and all, but nobody wants to see a remake of Cliffhanger.


Source: The Trades
Tags: News
Comments
GREAT idea......
Commented By: ClownShoes on 2009-05-14 14:21:17
How in the f*** can you compare Cliffhanger to Star Trek?!?! I want what that guy is smoking.
Why not do a sequel?
Commented By: El Kabuto on 2009-05-14 14:24:40
Stallone seems to be hot again and with The Expendables coming out soon it might more profitable to do a sequel than a retarded remake from an ok fun 90's film.
Oh yeah!
Commented By: Batzarro on 2009-05-14 14:37:57
A remake of he movie where the beat up and shot up Stallone carried a guy his size and impaled him on stalagtite.
We need to stop this
Commented By: ALEX on 2009-05-14 16:26:24
People should not be allowed to re-make successful movies till most of the original cast is dead. Sequel-fine. Reboot a failed movie like Hulk is okay. The only reason Hollywood is turning a profit is because they have stopped hiring writers.
focus
Commented By: Milo Ventimiglia's career on 2009-05-14 16:36:04
Guys, they should really be making a prequel. I mean, why reboot something which is already so great? I want to know how Stallone's character ended up in the mountains. I want to know how the mountains ened up having snow on them. I want to know where the snow came from, and if there is a possibility of more snow.. Those are the kinds of questions that should be addressed!
hey
Commented By: star wars on 2009-05-14 19:29:34
Where's the reboot of star wars? And the reboot of the reimagining of planet of the apes
LMAO MILO VENTIMIGLIA\'S CAREER
Commented By: F\ on 2009-05-15 10:57:39
"I want to know how the mountains ened up having snow on them. I want to know where the snow came from, and if there is a possibility of more snow.. " LMFAO !!!!!!!!!!!!
WTF!
Commented By: OrangeRush2112 on 2009-05-15 12:15:07
WTF means WHAT THE FUCK?!? - why dont they do a remake of showgirls and maybe do a prequel of that as well. why is hollywood forgetting movies like better off dead and one crazy summer - these should not be ignored as possible remakes. ha ha ha ha ha fuckers!